Cooley

Cooley v. Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20253:24-cv-01437California2,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FREDERICK MARC COOLEY, ) Case No. 3:24-cv-01437-AMO ) Plaintiff, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ) MOTION TO DISMISS OF vs. ) DEFENDANT MENZIES AVIATION ) (USA) INC. PURSUANT TO RULE MENZIES AVIATION (USA) INC; AMER SM ) 12(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF

ASIF; WILLIAM REVIS; JOHN DOE; JANE ) CIVIL PROCEDURE

DOE, ) *As Modified by the Court* ) Date: March 6, 2025 Defendants. ) Time: 2:00 p.m. ) Place: Courtroom 10 - 19th Floor ) ) ) Defendant Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc. (hereinafter “Menzies”), by and through its attorneys of record, Condon & Forsyth LLP, has moved this Court for an order dismissing plaintiff Frederick Marc Cooley’s (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is a lawsuit seeking damages arising…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.