Pugh

Pugh v. Arredondo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20253:24-cv-01890California735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARRYL PUGH, Case No. 24-cv-01890-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

S. ARREDONDO, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding events at the Correctional Training Facility (CTF). The Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 16. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now before the Court for screening pursuant to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Dkt. No. 18. For the reasons identified below, the complaint is dismissed. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.