Rivera

Rivera v. East Bay Municipal Utilities District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20253:24-cv-02491California2,838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IVETTE RIVERA, Case No. 24-cv-02491-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

v.

EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DISTRICT, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Pro se plaintiff Ivette Rivera has sued the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) and a host of individual EBMUD directors and employees (individual defendants). See generally Dkt. No. 1. She alleges claims of retaliation and sex-based discrimination under various state and federal statutes. Id. ¶¶ 64-101. EBMUD and the individual defendants waived service and moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Dkt. Nos. 12-13, 18. The complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. BACKGROUND As alleged in the complaint, Rivera is a “supervisory employee” at EMBUD and has worked there as a “Gardener Foreman” since January 24, 2005. Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 5. In 2015, Rivera sued EMBUD, and that action settled on April 20, 2021. Id. ¶¶ 6-7. Rivera says that before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.