Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIX PAYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-06297-MEMF (RAO)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

WARDEN, Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends the denial of the Petition, in which Petitioner seeks credits under the First Step Act (“FSA”), because Petitioner is not eligible for FSA credits due to his final order of removal. (ECF No. 9.) The Report also finds that the Court lacks jurisdiction to review the final order of removal. (Id.) Petitioner’s reply to the Report (ECF No. 10) does not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. \\ …