John Muldoon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20253:15-cv-02723California6,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MULDOON, Case No. 15-cv-02723-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEPUY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 104 Defendants.

13 Before the court is defendants Medical Device Business Services, Inc. f/k/a DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson International’s (collectively, “DePuy” or the “DePuy Defendants”) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth causes of action as alleged against them in the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”, Dkt. 90). Defendants filed their motion on January 8, 2025. Plaintiff has declined to file any opposition to the motion, and the deadline to do so has passed. The matter is therefore fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for March 6, 2025, is VACATED. Having read defendants’ papers and carefully considered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.