Lopez

Lopez v. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20254:23-cv-03660California1,386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDREW LOPEZ, Case No. 23-cv-03660-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 18 M. LEE, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate currently housed at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), has filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This order addresses Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 18. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 18, and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Bane Act claim. BACKGROUND The complaint sues defendants Pelican Bay State Prison officers S. Cupp, Hammer, Cross, M. Lee, Brewer, and K. Davis. The complaint alleges that, between May 2020 to March 2021, in retaliation for Plaintiff’s grievance activity, Defendants threatened to deprive Plaintiff of phone calls, out-of-cell time, or showers, in violation of the First Amendment and California’s Bane Act (Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.