Yost

(PS) Halajian v. Yost

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20251:24-cv-00826California5,904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

BARRY STUART HALAJIAN, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00826-JLT-SKO

FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

BE GRANTED

vs. (Doc. 32) 15 KELLY YOST, in his Official and Private OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS Capacity, the CITY OF FRESNO, A Municipal Corporation, DOES 1-20 inclusive,

Defendants. _____________________________________/ 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Barry Halajian, proceeding pro se, initiated this action against Kelly Yost and the City of Fresno (the “City”) (collectively, “Defendants”) by filing a complaint on February 21, 2024. (Doc. 1). On December 23, 2024, the assigned district judge adopted the undersigned’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 20) in full, dismissing the complaint and granting leave to amend. (Doc. 28). On January 13, 2025, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 29 (“FAC”)). Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.