Stultz
Stultz v. Doe 1
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Edwardo STULTZ, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1840-AGS-LR
Plaintiff,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
vs. TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS (ECF 3);
John DOE #1, Calipatria Correctional (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Officer; John Doe #2, Nurse; John Doe 8 #3, Centinela Correctional Officer; John Doe #4, Nurse, Defendants. 11 Edwardo Stultz, an inmate representing himself, filed a civil-rights complaint. (ECF 1.) He alleges defendants violated his rights by improperly obtaining his DNA and disclosing it to the prosecution a criminal case against him. (Id. at 9.) He also alleges officials “tampered” with his legal mail. (Id.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and dismisses the complaint for failure to state a claim and for violating Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Generally,…