Grayton

Grayton v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20253:24-cv-02427California4,316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:24-cv-02427-JAH-DDL

MAURICE GRAYTON, ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

(ECF No. 2);

16 v. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 18 (3) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL, (ECF No. 3); MARTIN O’MALLEY, et al., Defendants. (4) DENYING MOTION TO ADMIT EXHIBITS, (ECF No. 4). 22

24

26

28 INTRODUCTION On December 23, 2024, Maurice Grayton (“Plaintiff”),1 proceeding pro se, filed a complaint seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as damages, against Martin O’Malley (the former Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) and eight other named defendants involved in the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) hiring and selection process (collectively,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.