(PC) Seay v. California Department of Corrections/Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20251:25-cv-00178California1,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD L. SEAY, No. 1:25-cv-000178-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULT NOT BE DISMISSED AS

v. DUPLICATIVE OF CASE NUMBER 1:25-

CV-00177-SAB (PC)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/REHABILITATION, et (ECF No. 1) al.,

16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed February 11, 2025. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.