Dorado

Dorado v. Stephan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20253:25-cv-00083California3,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DORADO, Case No.: 25-cv-0083-WQH (SBC)

CDCR #BN-7728,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

SUMMER STEPHAN, San Diego District and Attorney; JESSICA COTO, Deputy San

Diego District Attorney; KATHERINE 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR CRUMB, San Diego Police Detective; FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM NANCY KARMELECH, Accuser; and CHARLES ROGERS, Superior Court Judge, 19 Defendants. 20 21 HAYES, Judge: 22 Plaintiff Daniel Dorado, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights 23 Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied by Motions to Proceed In Forma 24 Pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2, 6.1) 25 26 1 On January 13, 2025, Plaintiff filed his first Motion to Proceed IFP. (ECF No. 2.) On February 13, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second Motion to Proceed IFP. (ECF No. 6.) The two motions contain identical 28 I. Motions to Proceed IFP All parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.