Bernal

Bernal v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20252:19-cv-00482California2,731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM BERNAL, et al., No. 2:19-cv-00482-DC-AC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF TO REOPEN EXPERT DISCOVERY DEPARTMENT, et al., (Doc. No. 83) Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order to reopen expert discovery to permit Plaintiff to retain and disclose a medical expert witness to opine on the issue of causation of Plaintiff’s injuries. (Doc. No. 83.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion is taken under submission to be decided on the papers. Accordingly, the court vacates the hearing on the pending motion scheduled for March 7, 2025. For the reasons explained below, Plaintiff’s pending motion to modify the scheduling order will be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs William Bernal and Celia Bernal filed the complaint initiating this civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.