Messinger

(PC) Bland v. Messinger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20252:20-cv-00051California1,892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, No. 2:20-cv-00051-DAD-SCR (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO DISMISS

DEFENDANT MOSSINGER, AND

JON MOSSINGER, et al., DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S REMAINING

Defendants. CLAIMS AS HECK–BARRED (Doc. Nos. 58, 61) 17 Plaintiff Joshua Davis Bland, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 4, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ request to dismiss (Doc. No. 58) plaintiff’s claims as Heck-barred be denied. (Doc. No. 61 at 8–9.) Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded that: 1) the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.