(PS) Rivera v. CA Community Housing Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GEORGE RIVERA, CARMEN No. 2:22-cv-00346-DJC-SCR

MARTINEZ,

11 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 13 GREENE, FIDLER & CHAPLAN, LLP, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs proceed pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 32). The Court recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be DENIED and the matter be referred to the undersigned for further proceedings including the setting of a scheduling conference. I. Background and Procedural History Plaintiffs filed their Complaint pro se on February 22, 2022. Plaintiffs allege they are citizens of, and domiciled in, Idaho. ECF No. 1 at 1. Plaintiffs named as Defendants the California Community Housing Agency (“CCHA”), AMFP III Verdant, LLC (“AMFP”), and law firm Greene, Fidler & Chapman, LLP. Id. at 1-2. Plaintiffs allege they were the residential tenants of a property…