P.

P. v. Fullmer CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2013C070583California3,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The facts are taken from the probation report. The parties stipulated and defendant agreed that the factual basis for his plea was set forth in the sheriff‟s report which is summarized in the probation report. Part of the sheriff‟s report appears in the record on appeal. The probation officer also referred to the attachments and supplemental reports to the sheriff‟s report as well but the same are not in the record on appeal. Although documents including the “MDIT” interviews with the victims and the supplemental sheriff‟s reports dated August 11, 13, 17, 24, 25, 2010 and September 1, 2010, were provided to a medical expert, the same are not part of the record on appeal. On August 10, 2010, a hospital social worker contacted the sheriff‟s office, reporting that defendant had been admitted for a self-inflicted gunshot wound after his “granddaughter(s) told their mother he had sexually molested them.” The social worker then spoke with defendant‟s spouse and her daughter about the allegations. The next day, deputy sheriffs spoke with the victims‟ mother who admitted that her seven-year-old and 10-year-old daughters had reported being molested by defendant. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.