P.

P. v. Angelos CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2013B245599California596 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/16/13 P. v. Angelos CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, B245599

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA084708) v.

KIMBERLY ANGELOS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steven R. Van Sicklen, Judge. Affirmed. Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Kimberly Angelos. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

______________________________ Defendant Kimberly Angelos appeals from the judgment entered after her no contest plea to one count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.