Cobaugh

Cobaugh v. Reiter CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2013H038831ACalifornia775 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/16/13 Cobaugh v. Reiter CA6 Opinion following order vacating prior opinion

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SALLY COBAUGH, H038831

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. CV166711)

v.

PETER REITER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant Peter Reiter was a sole proprietor of a residential landscaping company. In the early 2000’s, he began to do work for Eve Kragneness, an 80-year-old widow who lived with her blind son, Jim Krageness. A personal relationship developed between the appellant and the Kragnesesses and the scope of the work he did for the family increased. This work continued until Eve’s death in 2006. Often Eve paid appellant much more than what he would have otherwise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.