Steidell
United States v. Steidell
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2744 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:12-cr-01259-DKW-2 v.
MEMORANDUM*
DAVID STEIDELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick Kahala Watson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
David Steidell appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).1 We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The district court denied Steidell’s motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) in the same order. Steidell waived any challenge to that denial by failing to raise it in his opening brief. See…