Sodhi

Sodhi v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 202524-3548California515 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NIKHIL SODHI; et al., No. 24-3548 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A240-259-446

A240-495-082

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Nikhil Sodhi and his minor daughter, natives and citizens of India, petition

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application

for asylum and Sodhi’s applications for withholding of removal and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.