Sodhi
Sodhi v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 202524-3548California515 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NIKHIL SODHI; et al., No. 24-3548 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A240-259-446
A240-495-082
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 18, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Nikhil Sodhi and his minor daughter, natives and citizens of India, petition
pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing
their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application
for asylum and Sodhi’s applications for withholding of removal and protection
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8…