Morales-Ramirez

Morales-Ramirez v. Arviza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 202524-3681California307 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEOBARDO MORALES-RAMIREZ, No. 24-3681 D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00711-HBK Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

M. ARVIZA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Helena M. Barch-Kuchta, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted February 18, 2025***

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Leobardo Morales-Ramirez appeals pro se from the district

court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 2241. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see

Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.