Harper

Harper v. Georges

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 202524-3514California407 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK ROY HARPER, No. 24-3514 D.C. No. 3:23-cv-05426-VC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PETER GEORGES, individually and in his official capacity as California Department of Fish and Wildlife; LORI FRUGOLI, individually and in her official capacity as District Attorney County of Marin; MICHAEL WEAR, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy District Attorney County of Marin; ZACHARY HARMON, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy District Attorney County of Marin,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.