Kincaid

United States v. Kincaid

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 202524-5270California302 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5270 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:13-cr-00818-PJH-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEANTE TERRANCE KINCAID, AKA

Tay-Tay,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Deante Terrance Kincaid appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As the district court concluded, Kincaid is ineligible for a sentence reduction

under Amendment 821 to the Sentencing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.