Tennigkeit
Tennigkeit v. Taylor
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TYLER MAXWELL TENNIGKEIT, No. 24-6322 D.C. No. 1:24-cv-01057-JLT-SKO Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TAYLOR, Warden, FCI Mendota,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Tyler Maxwell Tennigkeit appeals pro se from the district
court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see
Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Tennigkeit contends that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) is…