Proctor
Proctor v. Warden
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DWAYNE ALONZO PROCTOR, No. 24-7137 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 1:24-cv-01058-JLT-EPG v.
MEMORANDUM*
WARDEN, FCI Mendota,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Dwayne Alonzo Proctor appeals pro se from the district court’s order
dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
challenging his prison disciplinary proceedings. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2018), we affirm.