Jasmine Networds v. Marvell Semiconductor CA6
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/17/13 Jasmine Networds v. Marvell Semiconductor CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JASMINE NETWORKS, INC., H036684
(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. CV801411)
v.
MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
Defendant and Respondent.
Appellant Jasmine Networks, Inc. (Jasmine) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of respondent Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (Marvell). Jasmine sued Marvell on three primary claims: misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and intentional interference with contractual relations. After a trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Marvell on all of Jasmine’s causes of action. On…