In re Devin C. CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
DISCUSSION
A. Validity of Probation Condition that Devin Not Possess a Weapon
At the disposition hearing, the court imposed on Devin the following condition of
probation: "The minor shall not use, possess, transport, sell or have in or under his[]
control any firearm, replica, ammunition or other weapon, including a knife, any
explosive, or any item intended for use as a weapon, including hunting rifles or
shotguns." Devin contends this "weapons" condition is constitutionally invalid for lack
of a scienter requirement.
This issue was recently addressed in People v. Moore (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th
1179. There, the defendant was convicted for attempted second degree robbery and
misdemeanor vandalism. At sentencing, the court imposed a variety of probation
3 conditions, including a condition similar to the one at issue here that provided: "Do not
own, use, or possess any dangerous or deadly weapons, including firearms, knives, and
other concealable weapons." (Id. at p. 1183.) Like Devin in our case, the defendant in
People v. Moore contended that this probation condition was unconstitutionally vague
because it lacked an express knowledge requirement. (See ibid.)