United States v. Rudy Garcia

Good Law
729 F.3d 1171·2013 WL 3766663·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 201311-30348California3,478 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Rudy Martin Garcia was tried for first-degree murder after he shot David McCraigie. The jury was instructed on the elements of first- and second-degree murder and of voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. The jury convicted Garcia of involuntary manslaughter and otherwise acquitted him. Garcia appeals his conviction. He contends that the version of the Ninth Circuit model jury instruction for involuntary manslaughter given by the district court was defective in that it failed to tell the jury that “gross negligence,” defined as “wanton or reckless disregard for human life,” was required for a conviction. We agree that the jury instruction allowed the jury to convict Garcia without finding an essential element of involuntary manslaughter. We therefore reverse Garcia’s conviction.

I. Background

Garcia shot McCraigie on the Colville Indian Reservation in eastern Washington during the evening of November 4, 2009. Garcia and McCraigie had been friends since childhood. Garcia and another friend had been drinking at Garcia’s apartment, planning to go hunting the next day, when they ran out of beer. They drove Garcia’s Jeep two blocks to the McCraigie house where a drinking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.