Rosen

Rosen v. City of Hawthorne CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2025B337895California6,103 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 2/26/25 Rosen v. City of Hawthorne CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

BARRY ROSEN, B337895

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 23STLC01829)

CITY OF HAWTHORNE,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Armen Tamzarian, Judge. Affirmed. Gustavo Lamanna for Plaintiff and Appellant. Richards, Watson & Gershon, T. Peter Pierce and Carlee I. Roberts for Defendant and Respondent. _________________________

Barry Rosen appeals from the trial court’s order partially granting the City of Hawthorne’s (City) special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.