Moreno

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JOSE RIGOBERTO MORENO, Case No. 20-cv-02082-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER RESOLVING MOTION FOR

v. CLARIFICATION

PERKINS WILL, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 47, 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 57 Defendants.

10 On July 18, 2024, pro se plaintiff Jose Rigoberto Moreno filed a motion requesting that I reinstate his excessive force claims against numerous San Francisco public officials, claims that I dismissed with prejudice over four years ago. See Dkt. No. 45 (Motion for Relief from Judgment). Because Moreno failed to show justification for his more than three-year delay in moving for relief, I denied his motion. Dkt. No. 48 (Order Denying Motion to Reinstate Claim). He later asked me to “clarify” my order, arguing that it lacked “detailed reasoning.” Dkt. No. 49.2 My reasons for denying his motion were clearly expressed in that order, but I will restate them, briefly, here. A motion for relief from judgment based on mistake (Rule 60(b)(1)) or newly…