Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION v. IN LIMINE #7 10 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., 13 Defendants. Plaintiffs’ seventh motion in limine (ECF 575) requests an order under Federal Rules of Evidence 701 and 704 “excluding from trial certain opinion testimony from fact witness Michael C. Schmitz . . . and certain reports pre- pared by Milliman, Inc.” ECF 575, at 1.1 More specifically, Plaintiffs seek the exclusion of four categories of evidence: (1) any opinions from Schmitz “based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of [FRE] 702,” Fed. R. Evid. 701(c), quoted in ECF 575, at 2 (brackets in original); (2) any opinion testimony from Schmitz which relies on inadmissible hearsay, ECF 575, at 2; (3) any testimony from…