Martinez

Martinez v. Napa State Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20253:23-cv-04247California3,428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCELLA ELIZABETH MARTINEZ, Case No. 23-cv-04247-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 47 NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants.

12 The Department of State Hospitals1 filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims against it on the basis of statutory immunity and the failure to state a valid claim. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. All claims against the Department of State Hospitals—and Napa State Hospital, as the same entity—are DISMISSED. The unchallenged claims against the individual defendants will proceed. 18 BACKGROUND I. Factual Background The background facts are recited more fully in the Court’s prior order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. See Dkt. No. 32 (“Prior Order”). Here, as in the Prior Order, the Court assumes that the allegations of the complaint are true for purposes of deciding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.