Aliff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 20-cv-697-DMS-AHG HEATHER TURRY, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW PURSUANT TO RULE 50(b) VERVENT, INC., etc., et al.

Defendants.

17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Motion, ECF No. 369). Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition, (Opp’n, ECF No. 375), and Defendants filed a reply. (Reply, ECF No. 377). The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (ECF No. 378). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND The background of this case has been summarized in numerous prior orders. (ECF Nos. 128, 140, 151, 180). The facts…