Ramos

Ramos v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20251:21-cv-01103California5,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Nicole Ramos, No. 1:21-cv-01103-KJM-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Janel Espinoza et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Nicole Ramos brings this § 1983 action for alleged violations of her Eighth Amendment rights. Defendants move jointly for summary judgment and plaintiff countermoves for summary adjudication. The court denies defendants’ motion in part and grants the motion in 20 part, and denies plaintiffs countermotion. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Ramos brings this case for violations of her civil rights under the Eighth Amendment, 23 alleging sexual battery, supervisory liability and a conspiracy to violate her constitutional rights 24 while incarcerated. See First Am. Compl. § 1, ECF No. 46. Janel Escobedo (erroneously sued 25 herein as “Janel Espinoza”)! and Dr. Timothy Beach move jointly for summary judgment and

' The court cites Warden Escobedo’s declaration and supporting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.