Cupp

Cupp v. Lexisnexis Solutions

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20253:24-cv-00833California289 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 RONALD CUPP, Case No. 24-cv-00833-JD Plaintiff,

ORDER RE EARLY WARNING

v. SERVICES, LLC'S MOTION TO

DISMISS

LEXISNEXIS SOLUTIONS, et al., g Defendants. 9 Pro se plaintiff Ronald Cupp has sued several consumer reporting agencies that are said to || have reported inaccurate information about a bankruptcy proceeding involving him. See generally Dkt. No. 1. On April 29, 2024, Early Warning Services, LLC (EWS) moved to dismiss the || complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which 14 || relief can be granted. See Dkt. No. 38. Plaintiff Cupp’s opposition was due by May 13, 2024, but || he did not file one. Despite filing two case-management statements in the time since, Dkt. Nos. a || 46-47, Cupp has still yet to respond to the motion. “To be sure, [Cupp] gets some leeway as a pro se litigant,” Harrison v. City of Salinas, No. 23-cv-903-JD,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.