(PC)Kauth

(PC)Kauth v. Tulare County Sheriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20251:23-cv-01733California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH VINCENT KAUTH, No. 1:23-cv-01733 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF PLAINTIFF’S NON-PRISONER DEPARTMENT, et al., APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS DUE IN TWENTY-ONE DAYS Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a former county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 12, 2025, a notice of change of address filed by Plaintiff was docketed. ECF 21 No. 22. The address Plaintiff has provided in the notice appears to be a residential one. See id. 22 An individual released from incarceration must be allowed to apply to proceed under 23 general in forma pauperis provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.