Delgado

Delgado v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20251:24-cv-01396California1,771 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIRDIANA DELGADO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01396-KES-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF AND

COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

v. WHY DAILY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

CONTINUE AND WHY FULL SANCTION

TARGET CORPORATION, AMOUNT SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AND

REPORTED TO STATE BAR

Defendant. (Doc. 10)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

19 14-Day Deadline 20 Background Plaintiff Virdiana Delgado (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint in Kern County Superior Court, Case No. BCV-103400, on October 9, 2024. (Doc. 1). Defendant Target Corporation (“Defendant”) removed the state action to this Court on November 14, 2024. (Id.). On November 14, 2024, the Court entered the order setting the initial scheduling conference for February 11, 2025, at 9:30 AM. (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.