Yanez-Davison

Yanez-Davison v. UPS, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20252:23-cv-03016California6,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINA YANEZ-DAVISON, No. 2:23-cv-03016-DC-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT

UPS’S MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., et al., DEFENDANT DAVIES’S MOTION TO

DISMISS, AND DENYING DEFENDANT

Defendants. UPS’S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AS

MOOT

16 (Doc. Nos. 5, 12, 21) 17 This matter is before the court on Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s (“UPS”) motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) and motion to stay discovery (Doc. No. 12), and Defendant Jeff Davies’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 21). Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motions were taken under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. Nos. 6, 15, 23.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant in part Defendant UPS’s motion to dismiss, grant Defendant Davies’s motion to dismiss, and deny as moot Defendant UPS’s motion to stay discovery. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Christina Yanez-Davison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.