Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc. v. County of Kern

Bad Law
159 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 621·218 Cal. App. 4th 828·2013 WL 3989150
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2013F064154California5,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hill, J.

Plaintiff challenges the assessment of property taxes on the equipment and personal property in its novelty ice cream production lines. Plaintiff stipulated to or did not dispute various elements in the property tax assessment, leaving only a single issue to be determined; Whether plaintiff was entitled to a reduction in the value of the property, based on excess capacity or underutilization of the property, which plaintiff claims was the result of lack of market demand for the products produced by the equipment. The Assessment Appeals Board (the board) found in favor of defendant, and the trial court upheld that decision. Plaintiff appeals, contending the trial court applied the wrong standard of review and, if the substantial evidence standard of review applies, there was insufficient evidence to support the judgment. We find no error and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff operates a facility that produces bulk ice cream, sold in half-gallon containers, and novelty ice cream products, such as ice cream bars, ice cream sandwiches, and “push-ups.” It runs 27 production lines, which operate independently, each generally producing only one type of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.