In re Brown CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2025F088911California353 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/26/25 In re Brown CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re F088911

LAFRANCE BROWN, (Stanislaus Super. No. CR-24-007749)

On Habeas Corpus. OPINION

THE COURT

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. LaFrance Brown, in pro. per., for Petitioner. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, and Hannah Janigian Chavez, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. -ooOoo- Petitioner LaFrance Brown requests permission to file a belated notice of appeal in Stanislaus County Superior Court case No. CR-24-007749 under the doctrine of constructive filing. (See In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 86–87.) We conclude petitioner alleges sufficient facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.