Joel Ball v. City of Scottsdale
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202523-15015California825 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 27 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOEL BALL, No. 23-15015
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05815-SPL-DMF v.
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE; MEMORANDUM*
SCOTTSDALE CITY PROSECUTOR’S
OFFICE; CARON CLOSE;
SCOTTSDALE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; SEAN RYAN, Officer; SERBALIK, Officer; LEE, Officer; KANE, Officer; UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as other as-yet unknown Scottsdale Police Officers and John Does 1-50,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 27, 2025**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: S.R. THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Joel Ball appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in
favor of the defendants in his…