Joel Ball v. City of Scottsdale

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202523-15015California825 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 27 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOEL BALL, No. 23-15015

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05815-SPL-DMF v.

CITY OF SCOTTSDALE; MEMORANDUM*

SCOTTSDALE CITY PROSECUTOR’S

OFFICE; CARON CLOSE;

SCOTTSDALE POLICE

DEPARTMENT; SEAN RYAN, Officer; SERBALIK, Officer; LEE, Officer; KANE, Officer; UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as other as-yet unknown Scottsdale Police Officers and John Does 1-50,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 27, 2025**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: S.R. THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Joel Ball appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of the defendants in his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.