Vargas

Vargas v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202523-3436California1,702 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIAN VARGAS, individually on behalf Nos. 23-3189 of themselves and all others similarly 23-3436 situated; AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE D.C. No. BLIND, INC., 2:19-cv-08108-DMG-MRW Plaintiffs – Appellees / Cross – Appellants, MEMORANDUM*

v.

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL

LABORATORIES, INC.; QUEST

DIAGNOSTICS HOLDINGS,

INC.; QUEST DIAGNOSTICS

INCORPORATED,

Defendants – Appellants / Cross – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Defendants Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Quest Diagnostics

Holdings, Inc., and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (“Quest”) appeal the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.