United States v. Lee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202523-1687California1,303 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1687 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cr-00326-JFW-5 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAE YONG LEE, AKA David Lee,

Defendant - Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1688 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00326-JFW-6 v.

940 HILL, LLC,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 21, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Dae Yong Lee and 940 Hill, LLC (collectively, Lee) appeal their convictions

for honest services mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343,

1346, bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds in violation of

U.S.C. § 666(a)(2), and alteration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.