Tomas-Cruz

Tomas-Cruz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202523-4046California733 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN TOMAS-CRUZ; PETRONA No. 23-4046 FLORIDALMA LOPEZ- Agency Nos.

DIEGO; JOSELYNE MARLENY TOMAS- A215-910-717

LOPEZ; MARVIN ALEXANDER A215-910-365

TOMAS-LOPEZ; JUAN DANIEL

A215-910-366

TOMAS-LOPEZ,

A215-910-718

A215-910-719

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Juan Tomas-Cruz, his wife, and their three minor children petition for review

of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.