Planchard

People v. Planchard

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2025C099609California7,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099609

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 23FE006809)

v.

DAVID PAUL PLANCHARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Alexander J. Pal, Judge. Affirmed.

Brad L. Mahler, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Kimberley A. Donohue, Assistant Attorney General, Eric L. Christoffersen and Christopher J. Rench, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 A jury found defendant David Paul Planchard guilty of stalking Debra Doe and violating a protective order. On appeal, he contends that the stalking statute required the People to have proven he made persistent attempts to directly contact Doe. Because his harassing and threatening messages were publicly posted on Facebook rather than sent directly to her, he argues they could not be used to establish a harassing course of conduct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.