People v. Ward CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2025B336697California1,395 words

Opinion

Opinion

Viramontes, J.

Filed 2/27/25 P. v. Ward CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

THE PEOPLE, B336697

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA500761) v.

ADAM WAYNE WARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Craig E. Veals, Judge. Affirmed. Heather E. Shallenberger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________________ On May 19, 2022, the People charged Adam Wayne Ward with possession of child pornography after having had a previous conviction, under Penal Code section 311.11, subdivision (b). In April 2021, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.