Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Ahern

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20253:19-cv-07423California832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL GONZALEZ, et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-07423-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: COUNSEL’S MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR

PLAINTIFF DARRYL GEYER

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 517 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs’ counsel, Yolanda Huang, Richard Brody, and Thomas Nanney, seek leave to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Darryl Geyer. (Dkt. No. 517.) While Mr. Geyer has submitted several filings alleging misconduct, he has not explicitly responded to Counsel’s request to withdraw. (Dkt. Nos. 519, 524.) Having considered the motion and having had the benefit of oral argument on February 26, 2025, the Court GRANTS the motion as explained below. DISCUSSION Counsel seeks to withdraw from representation of Plaintiff Darryl Geyer because “irretrievable breakdown in communication between attorneys and client have resulted in a fundamental disagreement as to the prosecution of this matter.” (Dkt. No. 517 at 3.) 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.