Stroud Jr. v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20253:24-cv-01652California588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLARD RICHARD STROUD JR., Case No.: 24cv1652 DMS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

vs. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND (2) DIRECTING

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO

U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT

POLICE CHIEF SCOTT WAHL,

SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND OFFICER MCNETT, and DOES 1-25,

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

Defendants. U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) 18 Plaintiff Willard Richard Stroud Jr., a nonprisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Complaint alleging a violation of his federal constitutional rights. Plaintiff did not pay the $405 civil filing fee required to commence this action, but rather, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.