Greenlaw

Greenlaw v. Su

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20255:18-cv-04932California5,321 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ROSEMARY GREENLAW, Case No. 18-cv-04932-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER RE PARTIES' MOTIONS IN v. LIMINE

VINCENT N. MICONE, Re: Dkt. Nos. 135, 136 Defendant.

13 The Court held a pretrial conference on February 19, 2025. Dkt. No. 143. This order resolves most of the parties’ respective motions in limine and defers ruling on others. Dkt. Nos. 135, 136. The Court will issue separate orders regarding the parties’ proposed jury instructions and other matters discussed during the pretrial conference. The sole claim to be tried is whether the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) violated the Rehabilitation Act by terminating Ms. Greenlaw’s employment because of her disability. I. MS. GREENLAW’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE A. Motion No. 1 re Ms. Greenlaw’s Felony Conviction Ms. Greenlaw moves to exclude all evidence and argument regarding her prior felony…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.