Little Manila Rising v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LITTLE MANILA RISING, et al., Case No. 24-cv-07768-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS, DENYING MOTION TO
v. STAY, AND DENYING MOTION TO
INTERVENE
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 16, 24 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion to stay, Dkt. No. 16, Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 24, and San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District’s motion to intervene, Dkt. No. 14. The Court finds all three matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and deems them submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court DENIES the motion to stay and GRANTS the motion to dismiss. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ first claim for relief without prejudice. The Court also DENIES the motion to intervene without prejudice. I. MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STAY A. Background Plaintiffs Little Manila Rising, Medical Advocates for Healthy Air, and…