Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20255:21-cv-02419California3,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 IMPOSSIBLE FOODS INC., Case No. 5:21-cv-02419-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND

COUNTERCLAIMS; AND GRANTING

IMPOSSIBLE LLC et al., IN PART SEALING MOTION Defendants. [Re: Dkt. Nos. 121, 122]

10 Before the Court is Defendant Impossible LLC’s (“ILLC”) Motion to Amend Case Schedule and Counterclaims. Dkt. No. 121 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff Impossible Foods Inc. (“IF”) opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 132 (“Opp.”). ILLC filed a Reply in support of its motion. Dkt. No. 136 (“Reply”). The Court finds this motion suitable for submission without oral argument and hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for April 3, 2025. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the accompanying Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.